Sunday, June 13, 2010

Truth Against the World, including the Unitarians

Last weekend I went to "worship" at the First Unitarian Society of Madison, Wisconsin, in a building dedicated to making money off the reputation and the memory of Frank Lloyd Wright. I cannot say the building paid homage to his spirit; to my mind, it evoked very little of him, despite being designed by one of his avowed followers.

This Sunday, I went to a concert of the Bach Dancing and Dynamite Society in the Hillside Theater of FLW's Taliesin campus, and I feel invigorated by the spirit of all the great artists thereby represented, and far closer to God than I did at the FUS service last weekend. So, although it was not in so many words a religious outing, I enter this thought here:

"God is the great mysterious motivator of what we call nature and it has been said often by philosophers, that nature is the will of God. And, I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we'll find it in the nature of that thing."


Frank Lloyd Wright, as quoted in Truth Against the World : Frank Lloyd Wright speaks for an organic architecture (1987) edited by Patrick J. Meehan

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Sanctuary is Wherever You Are

I don't exactly know why, but I went to a Sunday service this morning. I don't think I can rightfully say "I went to church," but I did go to the meeting house of the Madison Unitarian Universalist Society, which is about as far from the modest meeting house of the local Quakers as you can possibly get. Indeed, they offer tours of the buildings after each and every service, all year round. Has something to do with the fact that the original building was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright, and something to do with the fact that this is a congregation that has a lot of remnant evangelical issues still flapping about on their to-do lists.

What I mean by this is that they have an awful lot of debt to pay-down. The addition to the original FLW construction cost a lot and then, as we all know by now, there was the "Economic Downturn." People, I have to say this: We got what we deserved. We thought we could have it all, even though our entire national economy is based on over-consumption of a finite resource which we buy at great cost from distant nations that don't like us. But we kept on buying, building, increasing our indebtedness, and now we finally have a scapegoat: the "Economic Downturn." It makes it seem like it wasn't our fault at all, like it was some machination of fate to which we cruelly fell victim.

But it was not. We created this. And the parking lot at the First Unitarian Society of very liberal Madison, Wisconsin was full of cars even on a day when the city had shut down most of its downtown streets to all but non-motorized means of transportation. Yes, there were Priuses among the cars; this is, after all, a congregation of liberals, most of whom have money, even if they no longer dress up for Sunday services or even iron their shirt collars.

A friend of mine belongs to the FUS here, and one day last summer she told me she'd spent the weekend sitting at a table at a community festival in our Eastside neighborhood talking to people about the FUS. "Why would  you do that?" I asked, thinking it sounded suspiciously like missionary work. "Well, we need to pay our staff," she explained. "So of course we need to enlarge our membership."

When those who belong to a spiritual organization start recruiting new members to pay their bills, it is time to stop building. The new UU building is lovely, and sets a high standard for sustainable building practices and materials, living up to the enormous cultural weight of its predecessor building, which is a national historic monument. The sound in the sanctuary is amazing. The sense of spaciousness and harmony are unmistakeable. And they didn't need it. Congregations do not need to grow. People do not need to drive across a city to enjoy an hour of intelligence and peace and the pure voice of a strong, pure soprano. Good restaurants do not need to become chains. Local is okay. Small is fine.

We don't need to make the world all like us. We just need to let the people of the world breathe and eat and snuggle with their children on an evening when the moon is full.  And we can do a lot more toward this simple goal if we stop driving cars rather than building designer sanctuaries of holiness built on assumptions of constant growth.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Be Fruitful and Multiply: Gods for Everyone



Funny. I don't remember the temple looking this grand, and this despite the fact that I distinctly remember gawking when I first glimpsed its ornately crowned white walls rising over the inordinately ordinary Midwestern suburb of Aurora, Illinois. There, in the middle of a verdant field of green, behind the gravel driveways and plastic tricycles and gas grills of another perfect Sunday in Middle America, the Hindu Temple rose like Atlantis out of the manicured and preternaturally green lawns: Another culture preserved and honored, given shelter.
I have to admit I kind of love the USA for this. We not only tolerate other religions than our own; we tolerate religious extremists. Not even our closest pals in democracy come close to us here. France is presently obsessed with finding a respectable rationale for banning Muslim women from wearing the birka or the niqab in public. While the French debate, Belgium passed a ban. Both countries seem to be relying on feminist support to make clothing criminal. Nuns throughout the Western world have been, not surprisingly, quite silent. I sort of think that if we're going to talk about how clothing manifests the oppression of females, we might want to also take a look at how Western culture sexualizes our female children. This, to me, is a lot more disturbing than a grown woman deciding to hide herself from the eyes of strangers on the street: the overly hormonal American adolescent girl wearing a shirt three sizes too small and breasts four sizes too large.
I think it's the meat we eat, frankly. All those damned hormones, the BGH, we ingest with our beef. How could it not have an impact on us? We are neighbors on the food chain, after all, what the cattle eat, we get. We know this deep inside, and for those of us who don't, there's Michael Pollan. But good Hindus don't eat beef, and given the scrawniness of the cows nonchalantly roaming the streets of the subcontinent Hindu cows don't eat anything remotely tainted with growth hormones! It was not altogether surprising, given this, that the children--amazingly well-behaved children--who followed their families around the stations of the temple on the day we visited were to a person pleasantly proportioned and singularly non-obese.
One cannot say the same for the Hindu deities however, many of whom were decidedly on the plump side of statuary physique. I suspect this is more a consequence of the inordinate amount of time these fellows sit than their diet. Deitic diet seems to consist of two food groups: Flowers and fruits. This makes for one of the more visually palatable arrays of food, and the worshippers at the temple devote a lot of time to enhancing this, arranging and rearranging mounds of fruit and flowers on large platters seemingly without end.
When we visited, these platters of fruit and flowers were being presented to enshrined golden deities in a variety of sizes and forms, some human, none of them breathing and, to the best of my knowledge and observances, none of them eating. None of the worshippers seemed in the least bit bothered by either deficiency and since no one, understandably, wanted to pause in their worship to tell the two obvious (pale skinned, light haired, blue eyed) Westerners what the presentation of these comely comestibles might mean to statues of stone or plaster, we just tiptoed around the shrines timidly before heading for the souvenir shop downstairs, aka the "Buy a Home Deity or Sari" Shoppe. Some weeks later, though, still sorting through the rituals and sights of that day in Aurora, Illinois, I found myself seated next to a lovely and very conversant Indian woman on a long plane trip. She was reading Danielle Steele; I was reading Midnight's Children. I asked her if she'd ever been to this temple once I knew she was a practicing Hindu who lived in the Midwest. She had. For the next two hours I plied her with questions.
"We want to show our devotion to the deity when we come to worship at the temple," she explained, with none of the hubris she might have claimed as a member of a culture approximately 5,000 years older than my own. "So we bring the best fruit and the prettiest flowers. It's called 'puja.'" I refrained from pointing out the obvious: that these deities were made of stone or clay or plaster and shellacked with some kind of probably toxic gold veneer. "So what is done with all the offering at the end of the day?" I asked instead.
"Oh, probably someone takes it home. Or it's given away," she shrugged. I wondered to myself if poorer worshippers stayed later in order to gain the leftover puja. There really ought to be some sort of pay-off for piety. It has always struck me as incredible that African Americans as a group are so religious; doesn't poverty ever seem evidence that God or the gods are pretty nasty as far as life constructs and concepts go? "It's good to take it home after the gods have received it," my patient seatmate was continuing my education. "It's 'prasada,'" she finished. "I'll have a Coke," she told the attendant. "Yes, Pepsi's fine."
All this emphasis on fruit and flowers is apparently not doing much good in the real world, though, where Indian men have the highest rate of cardiovascular disease of any identifiable population today. By the end of this year, it's expected that India will have fully sixty percent of all the world's heart disease cases. Perhaps someone should be talking to the deities about this, along with nuclear disarmament and the unsurprising fact that India's former untouchables are now converting to Islam in overwhelming numbers, finally finding a home that welcomes them as Hindus could never quite bring themselves to do.
But maybe the deities aren't doing too well. The temple, grand as it looked when we first spotted it astride the mowed green prairie, was worn and frayed up close. The white walls were in need of paint and replastering. The Rubbermaid garbage cans were full of uncollected offerings and sending up redolent reminders to the heavens right outside the temple's grand portal. Everything inside seemed sort of like it came from WalMart. But perhaps, if the worshippers are able to believe that the gold-lacquered gods can eat coconuts when no one's looking, perhaps a card table chair can be a throne.
The illusions of Hinduism at least seem pleasant and non-violent enough, so how could I really object?